NewDownload our latest UK audit report for FY2025
auditor.ltdNO

Audit in Ashford

253 companies in Ashford name an auditor; 64 disclose a fee. The median audit fee is £17,304, +15% against the UK. Magee Gammon Corporate Limited has the largest share.

253audited companies registered in Ashford
£17,304median audit fee, 64 fees on file
+15%against the UK median of £15,000
18audit firms with at least one client here

Who audits Ashford

Share of audited companies in Ashford, top ten firms

Big 4Challenger firmsIndependent firms
FirmTierClients hereShareMedian fee hereMedian fee, all clients
Magee Gammon Corporate LimitedIndependent firm2031.7%£17,816£17,096
Azets Audit ServicesChallenger firm711.1%£24,250£17,850
Kreston Reeves LLPChallenger firm711.1%£16,950£21,000
Kreston Reeves Audit LLPChallenger firm711.1%£17,600£22,350
Barnes Roffe Audit LimitedChallenger firm34.8%—£16,562
Xeinadin Audit LimitedChallenger firm34.8%—£14,850
Menzies LLPChallenger firm23.2%—£18,875
Mehta & Tengra—23.2%——
Xeinadin—23.2%——
Burgess Hodgson LLPIndependent firm23.2%—£11,152

Fees in Ashford by company size

Median audit fee in Ashford by revenue band

Bands with five or more fees on file

0£10k£20k£24,025Under £1mn=8£15,213£1–5mn=6£13,625£5–10mn=14£16,950£10–25mn=17£25,450£25–50mn=10
Revenue bandFees on fileAshford medianUK median
Under £1m8£24,025£12,500
£1–5m6£15,213£11,350
£5–10m14£13,625£14,500
£10–25m17£16,950£15,750
£25–50m10£25,450£19,500

Get quotes from audit firms working in Ashford

Tell us your size and sector and we will introduce three audit firms that fit, with their typical fee range. No account, no obligation.

We reply within one working day.

Your request goes to Benford Technologies Limited, which publishes auditor.ltd. By sending you agree to the terms of use, and we handle your details as the privacy notice describes.

A company is counted in Ashford by the town in its registered address at Companies House, which is not always where it trades.

Figures are indicative. They are computed from a sample of accounts filed with Companies House and the Norwegian register, read by machine, and are only as good as those filings; they can contain mistakes, and the dataset is not exhaustive. Found a mistake? Report it through the contact form.