Audit in Banbury
203 companies in Banbury name an auditor; 65 disclose a fee. The median audit fee is £14,950, +0% against the UK. Ellacotts Audit Services Limited has the largest share.
Who audits Banbury
Share of audited companies in Banbury, top ten firms
Ellacotts Audit Services Limited14.5%
Azets Audit Services14.5%
Hazlewoods LLP4.8%
Luckmans Duckett Parker Limited4.8%
James Cowper Kreston Audit4.8%
Anderson Anderson & Brown Audit LLP3.2%
Shaw Gibbs (Audit) Limited3.2%
HB&O Ltd3.2%| Firm | Tier | Clients here | Share | Median fee here | Median fee, all clients |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ellacotts Audit Services Limited | Independent firm | 9 | 14.5% | £11,925 | £14,800 |
| Azets Audit Services | Challenger firm | 9 | 14.5% | £3,500 | £17,850 |
| Hazlewoods LLP | Challenger firm | 3 | 4.8% | — | £16,075 |
| Whitley Stimpson Limited | — | 3 | 4.8% | — | — |
| Luckmans Duckett Parker Limited | Independent firm | 3 | 4.8% | — | £16,000 |
| James Cowper Kreston Audit | Challenger firm | 3 | 4.8% | — | £17,100 |
| Blencowes | — | 2 | 3.2% | — | — |
| Anderson Anderson & Brown Audit LLP | Independent firm | 2 | 3.2% | — | £19,448 |
| Shaw Gibbs (Audit) Limited | Independent firm | 2 | 3.2% | — | £15,200 |
| HB&O Ltd | Independent firm | 2 | 3.2% | — | £11,550 |
Fees in Banbury by company size
Median audit fee in Banbury by revenue band
Bands with five or more fees on file
| Revenue band | Fees on file | Banbury median | UK median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under £1m | 11 | £3,500 | £12,500 |
| £1–5m | 7 | £8,000 | £11,350 |
| £5–10m | 6 | £8,000 | £14,500 |
| £10–25m | 20 | £16,558 | £15,750 |
| £25–50m | 8 | £33,035 | £19,500 |
Get quotes from audit firms working in Banbury
Tell us your size and sector and we will introduce three audit firms that fit, with their typical fee range. No account, no obligation.
A company is counted in Banbury by the town in its registered address at Companies House, which is not always where it trades.
Figures are indicative. They are computed from a sample of accounts filed with Companies House and the Norwegian register, read by machine, and are only as good as those filings; they can contain mistakes, and the dataset is not exhaustive. Found a mistake? Report it through the contact form.