Audit in Bedford
263 companies in Bedford name an auditor; 70 disclose a fee. The median audit fee is £16,642, +11% against the UK. MHA has the largest share.
263audited companies registered in Bedford
£16,642median audit fee, 70 fees on file
+11%against the UK median of £15,000
29audit firms with at least one client here
Who audits Bedford
Share of audited companies in Bedford, top ten firms
MHA14%
HW Bedford Limited12.3%
GKP (Ampthill) Limited7%
Rawlinson Pryde Limited7%
Collett Hulance Accountants Limited5.3%
Big 4Challenger firmsIndependent firms
| Firm | Tier | Clients here | Share | Median fee here | Median fee, all clients |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MHA | — | 8 | 14% | £30,000 | — |
| HW Bedford Limited | — | 7 | 12.3% | £8,750 | — |
| GKP (Ampthill) Limited | — | 4 | 7% | — | — |
| Rawlinson Pryde Limited | — | 4 | 7% | — | — |
| Collett Hulance Accountants Limited | — | 3 | 5.3% | — | — |
| Azets Audit Services | Challenger firm | 3 | 5.3% | — | £17,850 |
| Mercer & Hole LLP | Independent firm | 2 | 3.5% | — | £18,850 |
| TC Audit Limited | Independent firm | 2 | 3.5% | — | £14,850 |
| Price Bailey LLP | Challenger firm | 2 | 3.5% | — | £20,400 |
| Affinia (Colchester) | Independent firm | 2 | 3.5% | — | £16,500 |
Fees in Bedford by company size
Median audit fee in Bedford by revenue band
Bands with five or more fees on file
| Revenue band | Fees on file | Bedford median | UK median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under £1m | 14 | £11,696 | £12,500 |
| £1–5m | 7 | £11,500 | £11,350 |
| £10–25m | 23 | £16,000 | £15,750 |
| £25–50m | 6 | £29,125 | £19,500 |
Get quotes from audit firms working in Bedford
Tell us your size and sector and we will introduce three audit firms that fit, with their typical fee range. No account, no obligation.
A company is counted in Bedford by the town in its registered address at Companies House, which is not always where it trades.
Figures are indicative. They are computed from a sample of accounts filed with Companies House and the Norwegian register, read by machine, and are only as good as those filings; they can contain mistakes, and the dataset is not exhaustive. Found a mistake? Report it through the contact form.