Audit in Cambridge
969 companies in Cambridge name an auditor; 99 disclose a fee. The median audit fee is £18,300, +22% against the UK. Price Bailey LLP has the largest share.
969audited companies registered in Cambridge
£18,300median audit fee, 99 fees on file
+22%against the UK median of £15,000
46audit firms with at least one client here
Who audits Cambridge
Share of audited companies in Cambridge, top ten firms
MHA6.3%
Williamson & Croft Audit Ltd4.2%
Staffords3.1%
Big 4Challenger firmsIndependent firms
| Firm | Tier | Clients here | Share | Median fee here | Median fee, all clients |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price Bailey LLP | Challenger firm | 11 | 11.5% | £21,000 | £20,400 |
| Peters Elworthy & Moore | Challenger firm | 9 | 9.4% | £10,610 | £14,100 |
| MHA | — | 6 | 6.3% | £34,750 | — |
| Ensors | Challenger firm | 4 | 4.2% | — | £19,000 |
| Williamson & Croft Audit Ltd | — | 4 | 4.2% | — | — |
| Azets Audit Services | Challenger firm | 3 | 3.1% | — | £17,850 |
| Staffords | — | 3 | 3.1% | — | — |
| Whitings LLP | Independent firm | 3 | 3.1% | — | £16,000 |
| Xeinadin Audit Limited | Challenger firm | 3 | 3.1% | — | £14,850 |
| Deloitte LLP | Big 4 | 2 | 2.1% | — | £17,067 |
Fees in Cambridge by company size
Median audit fee in Cambridge by revenue band
Bands with five or more fees on file
| Revenue band | Fees on file | Cambridge median | UK median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under £1m | 23 | £11,590 | £12,500 |
| £1–5m | 8 | £26,310 | £11,350 |
| £5–10m | 11 | £19,550 | £14,500 |
| £10–25m | 28 | £20,500 | £15,750 |
| £25–50m | 6 | £20,150 | £19,500 |
Get quotes from audit firms working in Cambridge
Tell us your size and sector and we will introduce three audit firms that fit, with their typical fee range. No account, no obligation.
A company is counted in Cambridge by the town in its registered address at Companies House, which is not always where it trades.
Figures are indicative. They are computed from a sample of accounts filed with Companies House and the Norwegian register, read by machine, and are only as good as those filings; they can contain mistakes, and the dataset is not exhaustive. Found a mistake? Report it through the contact form.