Audit in Ipswich
431 companies in Ipswich name an auditor; 155 disclose a fee. The median audit fee is £14,000, -7% against the UK. Ensors has the largest share.
431audited companies registered in Ipswich
£14,000median audit fee, 155 fees on file
-7%against the UK median of £15,000
38audit firms with at least one client here
Who audits Ipswich
Share of audited companies in Ipswich, top ten firms
BG Audit LLP5.9%
Walter Wright3.9%
Big 4Challenger firmsIndependent firms
| Firm | Tier | Clients here | Share | Median fee here | Median fee, all clients |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ensors | Challenger firm | 24 | 15.8% | £17,128 | £19,000 |
| Tahas & Co Ltd | Independent firm | 24 | 15.8% | £1,800 | £2,200 |
| Sumer Auditco Limited | Challenger firm | 20 | 13.2% | £16,122 | £15,750 |
| Affinia (Colchester) | Independent firm | 10 | 6.6% | £18,000 | £16,500 |
| Ensors Accountants LLP | Challenger firm | 9 | 5.9% | £14,884 | £14,688 |
| BG Audit LLP | — | 9 | 5.9% | £11,501 | — |
| Walter Wright | — | 6 | 3.9% | £10,838 | — |
| Knights Lowe Limited | Independent firm | 5 | 3.3% | £10,925 | £13,099 |
| Xeinadin Audit Limited | Challenger firm | 3 | 2% | — | £14,850 |
| Affinia (Stratford) | Independent firm | 3 | 2% | — | £15,500 |
Fees in Ipswich by company size
Median audit fee in Ipswich by revenue band
Bands with five or more fees on file
| Revenue band | Fees on file | Ipswich median | UK median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under £1m | 38 | £4,388 | £12,500 |
| £1–5m | 15 | £15,000 | £11,350 |
| £5–10m | 14 | £13,500 | £14,500 |
| £10–25m | 45 | £15,000 | £15,750 |
| £25–50m | 15 | £16,000 | £19,500 |
| £50–100m | 11 | £19,400 | £22,308 |
Get quotes from audit firms working in Ipswich
Tell us your size and sector and we will introduce three audit firms that fit, with their typical fee range. No account, no obligation.
A company is counted in Ipswich by the town in its registered address at Companies House, which is not always where it trades.
Figures are indicative. They are computed from a sample of accounts filed with Companies House and the Norwegian register, read by machine, and are only as good as those filings; they can contain mistakes, and the dataset is not exhaustive. Found a mistake? Report it through the contact form.