Audit in Peterborough
417 companies in Peterborough name an auditor; 123 disclose a fee. The median audit fee is £14,000, -7% against the UK. Azets Audit Services has the largest share.
Who audits Peterborough
Share of audited companies in Peterborough, top ten firms
Azets Audit Services31.1%
Price Bailey LLP10.1%
Streets Audit LLP5.9%
Moore4.2%TC Group4.2%
KLSA LLP2.5%
Charterhouse (Audit) Limited1.7%
Buzzacott LLP1.7%
Wright Vigar Limited1.7%| Firm | Tier | Clients here | Share | Median fee here | Median fee, all clients |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Azets Audit Services | Challenger firm | 37 | 31.1% | £11,394 | £17,850 |
| Price Bailey LLP | Challenger firm | 12 | 10.1% | £11,250 | £20,400 |
| MHA | — | 12 | 10.1% | £26,175 | — |
| Streets Audit LLP | Independent firm | 7 | 5.9% | £16,500 | £15,000 |
| Moore | Challenger firm | 5 | 4.2% | £10,750 | £15,000 |
| TC Group | Independent firm | 5 | 4.2% | £16,500 | £15,000 |
| KLSA LLP | Independent firm | 3 | 2.5% | — | £15,500 |
| Charterhouse (Audit) Limited | Independent firm | 2 | 1.7% | — | £15,600 |
| Buzzacott LLP | Challenger firm | 2 | 1.7% | — | £9,738 |
| Wright Vigar Limited | Independent firm | 2 | 1.7% | — | £18,255 |
Fees in Peterborough by company size
Median audit fee in Peterborough by revenue band
Bands with five or more fees on file
| Revenue band | Fees on file | Peterborough median | UK median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under £1m | 22 | £12,150 | £12,500 |
| £1–5m | 9 | £11,250 | £11,350 |
| £5–10m | 12 | £17,250 | £14,500 |
| £10–25m | 39 | £14,000 | £15,750 |
| £25–50m | 14 | £17,208 | £19,500 |
Get quotes from audit firms working in Peterborough
Tell us your size and sector and we will introduce three audit firms that fit, with their typical fee range. No account, no obligation.
A company is counted in Peterborough by the town in its registered address at Companies House, which is not always where it trades.
Figures are indicative. They are computed from a sample of accounts filed with Companies House and the Norwegian register, read by machine, and are only as good as those filings; they can contain mistakes, and the dataset is not exhaustive. Found a mistake? Report it through the contact form.