Audit in Reading
1,219 companies in Reading name an auditor; 125 disclose a fee. The median audit fee is £18,850, +26% against the UK. Azets Audit Services has the largest share.
Who audits Reading
Share of audited companies in Reading, top ten firms
Azets Audit Services16.1%Nyman Libson Paul LLP6.3%
James Cowper Kreston Audit5.4%
Menzies LLP4.5%
Xeinadin Audit Limited3.6%
Cooper Parry Group Limited3.6%
HaysMac LLP2.7%
Hazlewoods LLP2.7%
UHY Ross Brooke2.7%| Firm | Tier | Clients here | Share | Median fee here | Median fee, all clients |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Azets Audit Services | Challenger firm | 18 | 16.1% | £21,458 | £17,850 |
| Nyman Libson Paul LLP | Independent firm | 7 | 6.3% | £16,000 | £19,600 |
| James Cowper Kreston Audit | Challenger firm | 6 | 5.4% | £17,325 | £17,100 |
| Menzies LLP | Challenger firm | 5 | 4.5% | £16,000 | £18,875 |
| Xeinadin Audit Limited | Challenger firm | 4 | 3.6% | — | £14,850 |
| Cooper Parry Group Limited | Challenger firm | 4 | 3.6% | — | £16,800 |
| HaysMac LLP | Challenger firm | 3 | 2.7% | — | £17,900 |
| Hazlewoods LLP | Challenger firm | 3 | 2.7% | — | £16,075 |
| UHY Ross Brooke | Challenger firm | 3 | 2.7% | — | £17,500 |
| KNAV Limited | — | 2 | 1.8% | — | — |
Fees in Reading by company size
Median audit fee in Reading by revenue band
Bands with five or more fees on file
| Revenue band | Fees on file | Reading median | UK median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under £1m | 27 | £15,400 | £12,500 |
| £1–5m | 11 | £15,000 | £11,350 |
| £5–10m | 13 | £16,000 | £14,500 |
| £10–25m | 31 | £19,000 | £15,750 |
| £25–50m | 11 | £16,200 | £19,500 |
Get quotes from audit firms working in Reading
Tell us your size and sector and we will introduce three audit firms that fit, with their typical fee range. No account, no obligation.
A company is counted in Reading by the town in its registered address at Companies House, which is not always where it trades.
Figures are indicative. They are computed from a sample of accounts filed with Companies House and the Norwegian register, read by machine, and are only as good as those filings; they can contain mistakes, and the dataset is not exhaustive. Found a mistake? Report it through the contact form.