Audit in Rotherham
356 companies in Rotherham name an auditor; 92 disclose a fee. The median audit fee is £15,000, +0% against the UK. Xeinadin Audit Limited has the largest share.
Who audits Rotherham
Share of audited companies in Rotherham, top ten firms
Xeinadin Audit Limited12.6%
BHP LLP12.6%
Sumer Auditco Limited11.5%
Hart Shaw LLP11.5%
GBAC Limited4.6%
Buckle Barton Limited4.6%
BK Plus Audit Limited2.3%| Firm | Tier | Clients here | Share | Median fee here | Median fee, all clients |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xeinadin Audit Limited | Challenger firm | 11 | 12.6% | £9,800 | £14,850 |
| BHP LLP | Independent firm | 11 | 12.6% | £18,839 | £17,850 |
| Sumer Auditco Limited | Challenger firm | 10 | 11.5% | £16,988 | £15,750 |
| Hart Shaw LLP | Independent firm | 10 | 11.5% | £15,870 | £18,000 |
| GBAC Limited | Independent firm | 4 | 4.6% | — | £11,000 |
| Harris & Co Limited | — | 4 | 4.6% | — | — |
| Buckle Barton Limited | Independent firm | 4 | 4.6% | — | £12,000 |
| Hollis and Co Limited | — | 3 | 3.4% | — | — |
| Beldenn Ltd | — | 2 | 2.3% | — | — |
| BK Plus Audit Limited | Independent firm | 2 | 2.3% | — | £13,200 |
Fees in Rotherham by company size
Median audit fee in Rotherham by revenue band
Bands with five or more fees on file
| Revenue band | Fees on file | Rotherham median | UK median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under £1m | 20 | £12,000 | £12,500 |
| £1–5m | 5 | £6,690 | £11,350 |
| £5–10m | 5 | £13,500 | £14,500 |
| £10–25m | 28 | £14,575 | £15,750 |
| £25–50m | 10 | £18,875 | £19,500 |
Get quotes from audit firms working in Rotherham
Tell us your size and sector and we will introduce three audit firms that fit, with their typical fee range. No account, no obligation.
A company is counted in Rotherham by the town in its registered address at Companies House, which is not always where it trades.
Figures are indicative. They are computed from a sample of accounts filed with Companies House and the Norwegian register, read by machine, and are only as good as those filings; they can contain mistakes, and the dataset is not exhaustive. Found a mistake? Report it through the contact form.