Audit in Stockton-On-Tees
205 companies in Stockton-On-Tees name an auditor; 52 disclose a fee. The median audit fee is £11,475, -23% against the UK. Anderson Barrowcliff Limited has the largest share.
Who audits Stockton-On-Tees
Share of audited companies in Stockton-On-Tees, top ten firms
Anderson Barrowcliff Limited18.2%
Azets Audit Services18.2%
Robson Laidler Accountants Limited6.8%
Saffery LLP4.5%
Armstrong Watson Audit Limited4.5%
Waltons Business Advisers Limited4.5%| Firm | Tier | Clients here | Share | Median fee here | Median fee, all clients |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anderson Barrowcliff Limited | Independent firm | 8 | 18.2% | £19,270 | £15,450 |
| Azets Audit Services | Challenger firm | 8 | 18.2% | £15,975 | £17,850 |
| Davies Tracey | — | 4 | 9.1% | — | — |
| Mitchell Gordon LLP | — | 4 | 9.1% | — | — |
| Robson Laidler Accountants Limited | Independent firm | 3 | 6.8% | — | £9,800 |
| JBC Accountants Limited | — | 3 | 6.8% | — | — |
| S&W Audit 17 Queens | — | 2 | 4.5% | — | — |
| Saffery LLP | Challenger firm | 2 | 4.5% | — | £18,514 |
| Armstrong Watson Audit Limited | Challenger firm | 2 | 4.5% | — | £18,600 |
| Waltons Business Advisers Limited | Independent firm | 2 | 4.5% | — | £13,355 |
Fees in Stockton-On-Tees by company size
Median audit fee in Stockton-On-Tees by revenue band
Bands with five or more fees on file
| Revenue band | Fees on file | Stockton-On-Tees median | UK median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under £1m | 8 | £9,850 | £12,500 |
| £10–25m | 13 | £14,879 | £15,750 |
| £25–50m | 10 | £19,385 | £19,500 |
Get quotes from audit firms working in Stockton-On-Tees
Tell us your size and sector and we will introduce three audit firms that fit, with their typical fee range. No account, no obligation.
A company is counted in Stockton-On-Tees by the town in its registered address at Companies House, which is not always where it trades.
Figures are indicative. They are computed from a sample of accounts filed with Companies House and the Norwegian register, read by machine, and are only as good as those filings; they can contain mistakes, and the dataset is not exhaustive. Found a mistake? Report it through the contact form.