Audit in Surrey
263 companies in Surrey name an auditor; 55 disclose a fee. The median audit fee is £14,150, -6% against the UK. Menzies LLP has the largest share.
263audited companies registered in Surrey
£14,150median audit fee, 55 fees on file
-6%against the UK median of £15,000
32audit firms with at least one client here
Who audits Surrey
Share of audited companies in Surrey, top ten firms
Menzies LLP13.7%
TWP Accounting LLP7.8%
Shaw Gibbs (Audit) Limited7.8%Kingston Burrowes Audit Ltd7.8%
Azets Audit Services3.9%TC Group3.9%Ward Williams Limited3.9%
Shipleys LLP3.9%Hartley Fowler LLP2%
HaysMac LLP2%Big 4Challenger firmsIndependent firms
| Firm | Tier | Clients here | Share | Median fee here | Median fee, all clients |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Menzies LLP | Challenger firm | 7 | 13.7% | £13,750 | £18,875 |
| TWP Accounting LLP | Independent firm | 4 | 7.8% | — | £19,950 |
| Shaw Gibbs (Audit) Limited | Independent firm | 4 | 7.8% | — | £15,200 |
| Kingston Burrowes Audit Ltd | — | 4 | 7.8% | — | — |
| Azets Audit Services | Challenger firm | 2 | 3.9% | — | £17,850 |
| TC Group | Independent firm | 2 | 3.9% | — | £15,000 |
| Ward Williams Limited | — | 2 | 3.9% | — | — |
| Shipleys LLP | Independent firm | 2 | 3.9% | — | £3,400 |
| Hartley Fowler LLP | — | 1 | 2% | — | — |
| HaysMac LLP | Challenger firm | 1 | 2% | — | £17,900 |
Fees in Surrey by company size
Median audit fee in Surrey by revenue band
Bands with five or more fees on file
| Revenue band | Fees on file | Surrey median | UK median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under £1m | 14 | £17,495 | £12,500 |
| £5–10m | 8 | £9,675 | £14,500 |
| £10–25m | 14 | £16,575 | £15,750 |
Get quotes from audit firms working in Surrey
Tell us your size and sector and we will introduce three audit firms that fit, with their typical fee range. No account, no obligation.
A company is counted in Surrey by the town in its registered address at Companies House, which is not always where it trades.
Figures are indicative. They are computed from a sample of accounts filed with Companies House and the Norwegian register, read by machine, and are only as good as those filings; they can contain mistakes, and the dataset is not exhaustive. Found a mistake? Report it through the contact form.