NewDownload our latest UK audit report for FY2025
auditor.ltdNO

Independent firm · Barnet

Evans Mockler Limited

Evans Mockler Limited is named as auditor by 33 UK companies in the register, 31 of which disclose a fee. The median fee is £5,800 on a median revenue of £16.7m, or 0.03% of revenue.

33audit mandates
£5,800median fee · IQR £4,279–£18,532
0.03%median fee as a share of revenue (£1m+)
—median fee change, 13 companies with two years

Fees by client size

Evans Mockler Limited's median is above the market median in 1 of 2 revenue bands where it has five or more clients with a fee.

Revenue bandClients with a feeEvans Mockler Limited medianMarket medianDifference
Under £1m6£12,750£12,500+2%
£10–25m10£9,950£15,750-37%

Evans Mockler Limited: median fee by revenue band

Bands with five or more clients disclosing a fee

0£10k£12,750Under £1mn=6£9,950£10–25mn=10

Where its clients are

Clients by city

London17Barnet8Derby2Grimsby1South Greenford1Kings Langley1Watford1Harrow1

What its clients do

Clients by sector

Development of building proje…7Other specialised constructio…6Activities of other holding c…4Other business support servic…2Construction of commercial bu…2Recovery of sorted materials2Activities of construction ho…2Buying and selling of own rea…1

Compare Evans Mockler Limited with firms that fit your size

Tell us your size and sector and we will introduce three audit firms that fit, with their typical fee range. No account, no obligation.

We reply within one working day.

Your request goes to Benford Technologies Limited, which publishes auditor.ltd. By sending you agree to the terms of use, and we handle your details as the privacy notice describes.

Figures are aggregates over companies filed at Companies House naming this firm as auditor, as filed, without adjustment. A band is shown only with five or more clients. No affiliation with Evans Mockler Limited is implied.

Figures are indicative. They are computed from a sample of accounts filed with Companies House and the Norwegian register, read by machine, and are only as good as those filings; they can contain mistakes, and the dataset is not exhaustive. Found a mistake? Report it through the contact form.