NewDownload our latest UK audit report for FY2025
auditor.ltdNO

Independent firm · Malvern

Kendall Wadley LLP

LinkedIn

Kendall Wadley LLP is named as auditor by 26 UK companies in the register, 22 of which disclose a fee. The median fee is £9,825 on a median revenue of £4.1m, or 0.22% of revenue.

26audit mandates
£9,825median fee · IQR £2,520–£12,300
0.22%median fee as a share of revenue (£1m+)
—median fee change, 16 companies with two years

Fees by client size

Kendall Wadley LLP's median is above the market median in 1 of 2 revenue bands where it has five or more clients with a fee.

Revenue bandClients with a feeKendall Wadley LLP medianMarket medianDifference
£1–5m8£12,250£11,350+8%
£10–25m7£9,144£15,750-42%

Kendall Wadley LLP: median fee by revenue band

Bands with five or more clients disclosing a fee

0£10k£12,250£1–5mn=8£9,144£10–25mn=7

Where its clients are

Clients by city

Cheltenham8Worcester4Evesham2Leigh2Hereford2Pershore2Malvern1Stratford-Upon-Avon1

What its clients do

Clients by sector

Financial intermediation not …7Travel agency activities2Other processing and preservi…2Operation of sports facilities1Other residential care activi…1Other service activities n.e.…1Agents involved in the sale o…1Growing of cereals (except ri…1

Compare Kendall Wadley LLP with firms that fit your size

Tell us your size and sector and we will introduce three audit firms that fit, with their typical fee range. No account, no obligation.

We reply within one working day.

Your request goes to Benford Technologies Limited, which publishes auditor.ltd. By sending you agree to the terms of use, and we handle your details as the privacy notice describes.

Figures are aggregates over companies filed at Companies House naming this firm as auditor, as filed, without adjustment. A band is shown only with five or more clients. No affiliation with Kendall Wadley LLP is implied.

Figures are indicative. They are computed from a sample of accounts filed with Companies House and the Norwegian register, read by machine, and are only as good as those filings; they can contain mistakes, and the dataset is not exhaustive. Found a mistake? Report it through the contact form.