NewDownload our latest UK audit report for FY2025
auditor.ltdNO

Independent firm · Birmingham

Magma Audit LLP

auditregister.org.ukLinkedIn

Magma Audit LLP is named as auditor by 54 UK companies in the register, 44 of which disclose a fee. The median fee is £16,175 on a median revenue of £8.5m, or 0.11% of revenue.

54audit mandates
£16,175median fee · IQR £13,000–£18,892
0.11%median fee as a share of revenue (£1m+)
—median fee change, 19 companies with two years

Fees by client size

Magma Audit LLP's median is above the market median in 2 of 2 revenue bands where it has five or more clients with a fee.

Revenue bandClients with a feeMagma Audit LLP medianMarket medianDifference
Under £1m15£15,200£12,500+22%
£10–25m19£17,550£15,750+11%

Magma Audit LLP: median fee by revenue band

Bands with five or more clients disclosing a fee

0£10k£20k£15,200Under £1mn=15£17,550£10–25mn=19

Where its clients are

Clients by city

Leicester13Rugby5Syston4Loughborough4Leicestershire2Mansfield2Melton Mowbray2London2

What its clients do

Clients by sector

Activities of other holding c…7Other business support servic…3Manufacture of other parts an…3Manufacture of electric motor…2Other software publishing2Other letting and operating o…2Motion picture projection act…2Other manufacturing n.e.c.2

Compare Magma Audit LLP with firms that fit your size

Tell us your size and sector and we will introduce three audit firms that fit, with their typical fee range. No account, no obligation.

We reply within one working day.

Your request goes to Benford Technologies Limited, which publishes auditor.ltd. By sending you agree to the terms of use, and we handle your details as the privacy notice describes.

Figures are aggregates over companies filed at Companies House naming this firm as auditor, as filed, without adjustment. A band is shown only with five or more clients. No affiliation with Magma Audit LLP is implied.

Figures are indicative. They are computed from a sample of accounts filed with Companies House and the Norwegian register, read by machine, and are only as good as those filings; they can contain mistakes, and the dataset is not exhaustive. Found a mistake? Report it through the contact form.