NewDownload our latest UK audit report for FY2025
auditor.ltdNO

Independent firm · Weybridge

MGI Midgley Snelling LLP

LinkedIn

MGI Midgley Snelling LLP is named as auditor by 27 UK companies in the register, 25 of which disclose a fee. The median fee is £16,000 on a median revenue of £11.5m, or 0.12% of revenue.

27audit mandates
£16,000median fee · IQR £13,750–£21,000
0.12%median fee as a share of revenue (£1m+)
—median fee change, 17 companies with two years

Fees by client size

MGI Midgley Snelling LLP's median is above the market median in 2 of 2 revenue bands where it has five or more clients with a fee.

Revenue bandClients with a feeMGI Midgley Snelling LLP medianMarket medianDifference
Under £1m6£16,250£12,500+30%
£10–25m9£16,000£15,750+2%

MGI Midgley Snelling LLP: median fee by revenue band

Bands with five or more clients disclosing a fee

0£10k£16,250Under £1mn=6£16,000£10–25mn=9

Where its clients are

Clients by city

Weybridge8Addlestone4London3Marlow3Esher2Guildford2Maidenhead1Poole1

What its clients do

Clients by sector

Limited Liability Partnership5Activities of head offices4Activities of other holding c…2Machining1Hotels and similar accommodat…1Other information service act…1Other activities of employmen…1Other transportation support …1

Compare MGI Midgley Snelling LLP with firms that fit your size

Tell us your size and sector and we will introduce three audit firms that fit, with their typical fee range. No account, no obligation.

We reply within one working day.

Your request goes to Benford Technologies Limited, which publishes auditor.ltd. By sending you agree to the terms of use, and we handle your details as the privacy notice describes.

Figures are aggregates over companies filed at Companies House naming this firm as auditor, as filed, without adjustment. A band is shown only with five or more clients. No affiliation with MGI Midgley Snelling LLP is implied.

Figures are indicative. They are computed from a sample of accounts filed with Companies House and the Norwegian register, read by machine, and are only as good as those filings; they can contain mistakes, and the dataset is not exhaustive. Found a mistake? Report it through the contact form.