NewDownload our latest UK audit report for FY2025
auditor.ltdNO

Independent firm · London

MGR Weston Kay LLP

LinkedIn

MGR Weston Kay LLP is named as auditor by 31 UK companies in the register, 31 of which disclose a fee. The median fee is £23,950 on a median revenue of £13.4m, or 0.16% of revenue.

31audit mandates
£23,950median fee · IQR £17,000–£48,525
0.16%median fee as a share of revenue (£1m+)
—median fee change, 16 companies with two years

Fees by client size

MGR Weston Kay LLP's median is above the market median in 2 of 3 revenue bands where it has five or more clients with a fee.

Revenue bandClients with a feeMGR Weston Kay LLP medianMarket medianDifference
£1–5m5£27,383£11,350+141%
£10–25m7£27,100£15,750+72%
£25–50m6£17,828£19,500-9%

MGR Weston Kay LLP: median fee by revenue band

Bands with five or more clients disclosing a fee

0£10k£20k£30k£27,383£1–5mn=5£27,100£10–25mn=7£17,828£25–50mn=6

Where its clients are

Clients by city

London21Hemel Hempstead5St John's Wood1Bradford1Glasgow1Gloucester1Gloucestershire1

What its clients do

Clients by sector

Other service activities n.e.…4Other business support servic…3Television programme producti…2Limited Liability Partnership2Wholesale of waste and scrap2Other retail sale in non-spec…1Activities of head offices1Residential nursing care faci…1

Compare MGR Weston Kay LLP with firms that fit your size

Tell us your size and sector and we will introduce three audit firms that fit, with their typical fee range. No account, no obligation.

We reply within one working day.

Your request goes to Benford Technologies Limited, which publishes auditor.ltd. By sending you agree to the terms of use, and we handle your details as the privacy notice describes.

Figures are aggregates over companies filed at Companies House naming this firm as auditor, as filed, without adjustment. A band is shown only with five or more clients. No affiliation with MGR Weston Kay LLP is implied.

Figures are indicative. They are computed from a sample of accounts filed with Companies House and the Norwegian register, read by machine, and are only as good as those filings; they can contain mistakes, and the dataset is not exhaustive. Found a mistake? Report it through the contact form.