NewDownload our latest UK audit report for FY2025
auditor.ltdNO

Independent firm · Cheadle

Clarke Nicklin LLP

Clarke Nicklin LLP is named as auditor by 21 UK companies in the register, 17 of which disclose a fee. The median fee is £21,320 on a median revenue of £11.0m, or 0.16% of revenue.

21audit mandates
£21,320median fee · IQR £18,575–£22,875
0.16%median fee as a share of revenue (£1m+)
—median fee change, 14 companies with two years

Fees by client size

Clarke Nicklin LLP's median is above the market median in 2 of 2 revenue bands where it has five or more clients with a fee.

Revenue bandClients with a feeClarke Nicklin LLP medianMarket medianDifference
Under £1m6£22,031£12,500+76%
£10–25m10£20,888£15,750+33%

Clarke Nicklin LLP: median fee by revenue band

Bands with five or more clients disclosing a fee

0£10k£20k£22,031Under £1mn=6£20,888£10–25mn=10

Where its clients are

Clients by city

Stockport6Manchester3Cheadle2Cambridge1Foxton1Hull1Oldbury1Maidenhead1

What its clients do

Clients by sector

Retail sale via mail order ho…2Manufacture of optical precis…1Manufacture of other special-…1Manufacture of other chemical…1Management consultancy activi…1Manufacture of other machine …1Manufacture of other furniture1Lead, zinc and tin production1

Compare Clarke Nicklin LLP with firms that fit your size

Tell us your size and sector and we will introduce three audit firms that fit, with their typical fee range. No account, no obligation.

We reply within one working day.

Your request goes to Benford Technologies Limited, which publishes auditor.ltd. By sending you agree to the terms of use, and we handle your details as the privacy notice describes.

Figures are aggregates over companies filed at Companies House naming this firm as auditor, as filed, without adjustment. A band is shown only with five or more clients. No affiliation with Clarke Nicklin LLP is implied.

Figures are indicative. They are computed from a sample of accounts filed with Companies House and the Norwegian register, read by machine, and are only as good as those filings; they can contain mistakes, and the dataset is not exhaustive. Found a mistake? Report it through the contact form.